Compare

Sendshot vs Jam

Jam is great at what it's built for: people on your team capture bugs with a browser extension, including a replay and dev tools logs. Sendshot sits on your site instead, so clients and users who will never install an extension can report problems with the same technical context attached.

All comparisons

The first year, in dollars.

Sendshot

$49once

Lifetime, paid once. Or $9/mo. Extra teammates are $5/mo each.

Jam

$168first year

Team at $14/mo per creator, billed yearly. There is also a free plan with 30 captures a month.

Side by side

Who reports
SendshotAnyone on your site: clients, users, stakeholdersJamMainly your own team, via extension or desktop app
Install
SendshotOne script tag on your siteJamBrowser extension per person
Starting price
SendshotFree for 10 reports, then $9/mo or $49 onceJamFree (30 captures/mo), Team $14 per creator/mo yearly
One-time option
SendshotLifetime, $49JamNo
Console logs & network requests
SendshotYesJamYes
Screen recording
SendshotNo, screenshots with annotationsJamYes
Integrations
SendshotEmail notificationsJamJira, Linear, GitHub, Slack and more

Jam prices from their public pricing page, checked September 28, 2026. Prices change, so check theirs before you decide.

Fair is fair

Pick Jam if

  • Your QA team and developers report bugs themselves
  • You want video replays of the bug
Our pick, obviously

Pick Sendshot if

  • The feedback comes from clients or users who won't install anything
  • You want the report to arrive with context without asking them to do anything extra
Also compared:vs Marker.iovs BugHerdvs Userbackvs Feedbucket

See for yourself

Add Sendshot to a site in a minute. Your first 10 reports are free.

Start free

No credit card required.